Every new AI law names an entity. Enforcement will find a person.
This tracker follows AI legislation through that lens — what each rule requires, and who inside your organization would have to answer for it.
Name Standard℠ Map
Toggle between USA and global views to see state-by-state and global AI regulations, categorized by human accountability signal.
Lozen Advisory's Name Standard℠
Every regulation in this tracker is read against the same five-pillar standard used to test whether human oversight of an AI-assisted decision is real — not ceremonial. The Name Standard℠ Signal column below reflects what each law actually requires against this standard.
Time Allocation
Adequate time to verify outputs.
Review Capacity and Tools
Tools and data to validate.
Information Access
Visibility into provenance and models.
Documentation Infrastructure
Logged evidence for compliance review.
Formal Right of Refusal
Authority to halt or escalate.
State-by-State & Global AI Regulations
The AI Regulations Index organizes selected AI laws and policy frameworks by jurisdiction, rule name, status, sector scope, effective date, source record, and Name Standard℠ classification — helping boards, legal teams, and compliance leaders identify where emerging AI regulation creates human-accountability gaps.
Search, sort, filter, and resize columns. Click a rule or regulation name to open its source document — click anywhere else on a row to view the full record.
This tracker is part of Lozen Advisory's broader Disclosure-Independent Governance℠ methodology for evaluating board evidence, human accountability, and enterprise exposure.
Human Accountability Classification: 13 Documentation Only · 6 No Human Accountability · 6 Explicit Human Review · 3 Undefined Oversight
Does your team have the capacity to sign off on AI-assisted output?
Do your reviewers have the explicit capacity, information, and formal right of refusal to legally and professionally sign off on AI-assisted corporate output?